The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Legislation is likely to effectively ban stablecoins USD Tether (USDT) and USDC by requesting stablecoins issuers to build up a sufficiently liquid reserve, with a 1/1 ratio and partly in the form of deposits which, USDT and USDC are unlikely to do. The legislations is also designed to make life tougher for crypto exchanges. In the US, regulators are trying to separate the bad actors in the crypto space — those actively committing fraud — from those who want to advance crypto and its market infrastructure, according to Dawn Stump, the former commissioner at the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The Central banks of GCC countries on the other hand have made huge strides in lightly regulating crypto assets.
The Central Bank of the tiny gulf emirate of Bahrain (CBB) enacted banking regulations for digital assets allowing cryptocurrencies as an official method of payment since 2019. The CBB regulation allows banks in Bahrain to work with exchanges so that customers can withdraw and deposit their money easily. CBB launched FinHub 973, a virtual platform to allow fintech companies to test their solutions through the regulatory Sandbox and connect with the hub’s global network for funding and business opportunities. FinHub 973 is all about supporting innovation in the sector and is a good example of the driving forces behind the region’s shifting fintech landscape.
The Saudi Central Bank and Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates have been working together to learn how the two banks can adopt blockchain and digital payments. Saudi Arabia's Financial Sector Development Program (FSDP) launched the Fintech Strategy Implementation Plan in June 2022 to make Riyadh a global Fintech hub. In contrast to their Gulf neighbours, Qatar currently has a ban on cryptocurrency trade with the exception of security tokens in 2020. In most other countries, digital assets fall under the jurisdiction of securities regulators, not central banks.
In Saudi Arabia, the fintech sector generated approximately $157.2 million in venture capital (VC) investments in the first eight months of 2021, up staggeringly from $7.8 million in 2020 and $18 million in 2019. In 2022, the Saudi VC market witnessed a record funding of $584 million in the first half, a 244 percent increase in comparison to the same period in 2021. Saudi Aramco's Prosperity7 Ventures, a one-billion-dollar Venture Capital fund aims to build on this success by identifying ground-breaking companies with exceptional leadership in diverse industries deploying disruptive technologies with the ability to scale and transform.
A blog focused on educating global physical energy commodities participants on evolving financial, regulatory and marketing developments in the Asian commodities markets including use of cryptocurrencies in physical commodities trading. This blog seeks to educate market participants only and does not constitute financial advice.
Thursday, 25 August 2022
Saturday, 20 August 2022
Commodities Lectures Series - Commodity Trading Companies vs Investment Banks and hedge funds vs - a new competitor - Commodity Producers
Without price transparency in physical commodities markets with clear and accessible reference commodities prices, physical commodities traders are in a powerful position to profit as they have a virtual information monopoly. Commodities Trading Companies such as Vitol, Trafigura, Glencore, Gunvor, Louis Dreyfus among others trade physical commodities taking advantage of this price opacity, investing in the physical and human capital necessary to transform commodities while simultaneously hedging their physical trades through financial (paper) trading on exchanges thus taking positions in the futures markets and the physical markets. Commodity trading firms do not tend to speculate on the outright direction of commodity prices, but instead aim to profit on the differential between the untransformed and transformed commodity specializing in (1) the production and analysis of information, buyers and sellers active in the market, supply and demand patterns, price structures (over space, time, and form), transformation technologies, and (2) the utilization of this information to optimize transformations in terms of space, time and form. Commodities trading firms attempt to identify the most valuable of these transformations, undertake the transactions necessary to make these transformations and engage in the physical and operational actions necessary to carry them out.
On top of physical trading, Commodity Trading Companies possess prop paper-trading desks. Using market intelligence coming from physical trading desks and ‘classic’ paper trading skills, these companies make profits on swaps, options and futures. They also use these paper trading books to hedge their physical exposure, which subsequently reduce their risk.These companies develop their own strategies and models - quantitative, computer-algorithm-driven or macro-driven similar to the models used in banks or hedge funds for derivatives pricing and market forecasting. They invest in physical commodities fundamental research to get an edge over their competitors and figure out where the market is going. They have on-site associates at origin and destination (offices in exporting and importing countries) to get a flavor of the local market as well as strong middle and back office for physical trading operations. They are highly skilled at managing their risks and know how to create sustainable and win-win relationships with potential buyers and sellers. Due to rising competition and change in business trends, these companies do invest at the source in mines, Exploration and Production (oil), and also transportation infrastructure such as ports. Vitol/Trafigura physically send ships to collect the cargo from the sellers, the miners and the refineries. Some like Glencore own mines (after buying Xstrata). Glencore is now a mining and trading company besides being a Commodities Trading Company. Trafigura is trading with no mining operations. It buys ore, concentrates or even refined outputs, ships them to the buyers. Trafigura model helps even for smaller operations.
Hedge funds on the other hand rarely trade physical form of commodities or take delivery concentrating only on financial or paper trading. Macro-focused hedge funds seek a hedge against an economic slowdown priced in by the market. Unlike many of their equity fund peers, commodities macro managers of the likes of George Soros and Louis Baconare are not dependent on rising markets for their gains. Rather, they look for volatility in commodities markets through 'Asset backed Trading' - a style of commodity trading which is used to seek and exploit market volatility in order to optimise the operational assets, inventory and future produce owned by trading entities. This is their core activity. However more sophisticated funds would also get into taking proprietary positions, market making and offer structured products to their clients. Hedge funds and Investment banks are beginning to exit the financial trading of commodities making daily price swings far greater than in previous years.
Financial trading is becoming an ever more important part of Commodities producers such as International Oil Majors Shell, BP, Total driven by fears that global oil demand could drop in the next few years as climate change concerns reshape society’s—and investors’—attitudes toward fossil fuel producers. The immense scale of the commodities producers' trading units gives them outsize clout. They have massive trading floors that mirror those of Wall Street’s biggest banks. Being a commodities producer gives an inherently bigger advantage with more reliable market information in trading strategy than commodities traders suchas Vitol/Trafigura. This is also the reason why in recent years, Vitol has started looking for refining and storage assets worldwide to control a bigger chunk of the supply chain. BP controls exploration and production as well, so BP obviously has advantage over oil traders who are unable to control costs associated with these projects and an oil company like BP will make more money when the production cost remains stable while prices rise. The problem for a crude oil trader like Vitol is to anticipate the price rise and buy oil from producers at sufficiently lower price to make a profit. Sometimes, the trading strategy for Vitol is so complex that the wafer thin margins made through a trade are actually made through minimizing on transportation costs of the oil instead of the oil price itself. On one occasion in 2016, for example, Shell bought roughly 70% of the cargoes of North Sea crude available for a particular month, triggering wild price gyrations while squeezing out commodities traders who privately complained to Shell. Commodities producers are also moving into the space formerly occupied by the commodities desks of Investment Banks. Shell, for example, in 2016 became the first nonbank to help the Mexican government hedge its exposure to the price of oil. BP's customers now include banks, hedge funds and private equity firms. Exxon is also hiring experienced oil traders to start making bets with the company’s money.
On top of physical trading, Commodity Trading Companies possess prop paper-trading desks. Using market intelligence coming from physical trading desks and ‘classic’ paper trading skills, these companies make profits on swaps, options and futures. They also use these paper trading books to hedge their physical exposure, which subsequently reduce their risk.These companies develop their own strategies and models - quantitative, computer-algorithm-driven or macro-driven similar to the models used in banks or hedge funds for derivatives pricing and market forecasting. They invest in physical commodities fundamental research to get an edge over their competitors and figure out where the market is going. They have on-site associates at origin and destination (offices in exporting and importing countries) to get a flavor of the local market as well as strong middle and back office for physical trading operations. They are highly skilled at managing their risks and know how to create sustainable and win-win relationships with potential buyers and sellers. Due to rising competition and change in business trends, these companies do invest at the source in mines, Exploration and Production (oil), and also transportation infrastructure such as ports. Vitol/Trafigura physically send ships to collect the cargo from the sellers, the miners and the refineries. Some like Glencore own mines (after buying Xstrata). Glencore is now a mining and trading company besides being a Commodities Trading Company. Trafigura is trading with no mining operations. It buys ore, concentrates or even refined outputs, ships them to the buyers. Trafigura model helps even for smaller operations.
Hedge funds on the other hand rarely trade physical form of commodities or take delivery concentrating only on financial or paper trading. Macro-focused hedge funds seek a hedge against an economic slowdown priced in by the market. Unlike many of their equity fund peers, commodities macro managers of the likes of George Soros and Louis Baconare are not dependent on rising markets for their gains. Rather, they look for volatility in commodities markets through 'Asset backed Trading' - a style of commodity trading which is used to seek and exploit market volatility in order to optimise the operational assets, inventory and future produce owned by trading entities. This is their core activity. However more sophisticated funds would also get into taking proprietary positions, market making and offer structured products to their clients. Hedge funds and Investment banks are beginning to exit the financial trading of commodities making daily price swings far greater than in previous years.
Financial trading is becoming an ever more important part of Commodities producers such as International Oil Majors Shell, BP, Total driven by fears that global oil demand could drop in the next few years as climate change concerns reshape society’s—and investors’—attitudes toward fossil fuel producers. The immense scale of the commodities producers' trading units gives them outsize clout. They have massive trading floors that mirror those of Wall Street’s biggest banks. Being a commodities producer gives an inherently bigger advantage with more reliable market information in trading strategy than commodities traders suchas Vitol/Trafigura. This is also the reason why in recent years, Vitol has started looking for refining and storage assets worldwide to control a bigger chunk of the supply chain. BP controls exploration and production as well, so BP obviously has advantage over oil traders who are unable to control costs associated with these projects and an oil company like BP will make more money when the production cost remains stable while prices rise. The problem for a crude oil trader like Vitol is to anticipate the price rise and buy oil from producers at sufficiently lower price to make a profit. Sometimes, the trading strategy for Vitol is so complex that the wafer thin margins made through a trade are actually made through minimizing on transportation costs of the oil instead of the oil price itself. On one occasion in 2016, for example, Shell bought roughly 70% of the cargoes of North Sea crude available for a particular month, triggering wild price gyrations while squeezing out commodities traders who privately complained to Shell. Commodities producers are also moving into the space formerly occupied by the commodities desks of Investment Banks. Shell, for example, in 2016 became the first nonbank to help the Mexican government hedge its exposure to the price of oil. BP's customers now include banks, hedge funds and private equity firms. Exxon is also hiring experienced oil traders to start making bets with the company’s money.
Labels:
BP,
Commodities Producers,
Commodities Trading Companies,
Glencore,
Gunvor,
Hedge Funds,
Louis Dreyfus,
Oil,
Oil trading,
Physical commodities,
Shell,
Trafigura,
Vitol
Location:
Czechia
Thursday, 18 August 2022
Central Bank Digital Currencies - the Digital Euro and the Digital Dollar
In July 2022, the European Central Bank published a blog on the "key objectives of the digital euro". The blog co-authored by none other than Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB argued that a digital payment ecosystem such as the digital Euro without a strong monetary anchor would create confusion leading to financial instability as "it is crucial that we all still have easy access to central bank money, which is the foundation of our currency".
In January 2022, the Federal Reserve came out with a highly anticipated paper on a digital dollar, taking a step in a process that could lead to Congressional action. This was followed in March 2022 by an Executive Order from the Biden administration placing the “highest urgency” on exploring a US CBDC and asks for an interagency report on all aspects of the future of money in the next 180 days. The Executive Order also advances US participation in cross-border experimentation of wholesale CBDCs.
The ECB is analyzing how financial intermediaries could provide front-end services that build on a digital euro. The analysis expected to completed by October 2023 followed by the development of integrated services as well as carry out testing and possible live experimentation of a digital euro in a phase that could take around three years. Extrapolating this timeline guidance from the ECB, it would be safe to assume that a digital Euro will not be available before 2028 at the very earliest. The ECB is likely to drive large scale adoption of the digital euro once adopted and likely to increase the proposed amount of digital euros in circulation to 1.5 trillion euros to control the negative effects on financial stability.
The Fed also sees commercial banks and nonbank financial companies acting as intermediaries. Banks would issue and manage the digital wallets that people would use for payments and deposits. The US is the furthest behind when it comes to developing CBDCs among the G7 economies, according to the Atlantic Council.
Central bank digital currencies like the digital dollar and the digital euro are expected to be used for payment settlement. CBDCs pose tough competition to cryptocurrencies used for cross-border payment settlements such as Ripple (XRP) and to a limited extent Bitcoin (BTC). The underlying technology for both the digital dollar and the digital euro is based on concepts in cryptography and distributed or decentralized solutions such as DLT.
The Fed also sees commercial banks and nonbank financial companies acting as intermediaries. Banks would issue and manage the digital wallets that people would use for payments and deposits. The US is the furthest behind when it comes to developing CBDCs among the G7 economies, according to the Atlantic Council.
Central bank digital currencies like the digital dollar and the digital euro are expected to be used for payment settlement. CBDCs pose tough competition to cryptocurrencies used for cross-border payment settlements such as Ripple (XRP) and to a limited extent Bitcoin (BTC). The underlying technology for both the digital dollar and the digital euro is based on concepts in cryptography and distributed or decentralized solutions such as DLT.
Labels:
Bitcoin,
BTC,
Central Banks,
Cross-border,
ECB,
Euro,
Federal Reserve,
Ripple,
US dollar,
XRP
Location:
Czechia
Wednesday, 17 August 2022
Commodities Lectures Series - Physical commodities trading vs. Exchange based commodities futures trading
Physical commodities trading is buying commodities from producers, transforming the purchased commodities to maximize their value and selling it to consumers getting maximum margin out of these structured trades. How the trade settles and how the quality of a commodity is assessed relies on the physical commodity itself as they are extraordinarily diverse in terms of location (of both producers and consumers) and physical characteristics. For instance, energy, including crude oil is traded with constant demand and refineries are optimized to process particular types of crude oil - light, heavy, sweet sour, and different refineries are optimized differently for derivative products such as Diesel, Petrochemicals. Purchase of energy commodities is a complex process which involves negotiations of contract floating of tenders, shipping arrangements, unloading at ports, transporting to refineries, refinery complexity and most importantly the discounts offered by the sellers. Given the complexity of the possible transformations, and the ever-changing conditions that affect the efficient set of transformations, physical commodities trading is an inherently dynamic, complex, and highly information-intensive task involving information gathering, analysis and the operational capabilities necessary to respond efficiently to this information.
Physical commodities trading requires matching numerous diverse producers and consumers with heterogeneous and highly idiosyncratic preferences directing resources to their highest value uses in response to price signals requiring strong relationships with market players (buyers and sellers of commodities). Physical commodities markets are mostly cyclic, have a seasonal trend and a convenience yield (the consumer wants it now and is willing to pay a higher price for it). Physical commodities traders search producer side and consumer side of the market to find sellers and buyers (bilateral “search” markets), and match them by buying from the former and selling to the latter in bilateral transactions in between adding value by transforming the commodities. Commodities producers are usually not end users and commodities need to be transported from source to destinations creating bottlenecks and an opportunity to make significant margins for traders. Physical traders can also profit through shipping, warehousing, and trade finance of the commodities. Physical commodities trading is also known as the “spot” or “cash” market.
Physical commodities trading is a human-driven business - Humans and relationships are predominant from the very beginning until the end of the trade. Humans will extract coal and assess the quality of it. Humans will test the quality of coal at loading port and discharging port. Human will negotiate premiums and discounts. Human will react against market movements and sometimes refuse to deliver or receive the commodity if prices go against market direction based on market intelligence.
Electronic Exchanges trading commodities futures are not suited to this matching process. They may be an efficient way to transact highly standardized instruments such as plain-vanilla front month contracts in large quantity, but are not well-adapted to predict the downward or upward price movement on commodities such as natural gas resulting from a pipeline explosion or the reaction of oil prices to a news events about an outbreak of war or comments from a Saudi oil minister. Little physical commodities actually change hands with futures trades, which take place on two main exchanges in the US, CME Group and the Intercontinental Exchange. In some commodities such as oil, futures trading has come to dwarf the physical trade, with as much as 13 times the physical amount of oil traded via these purely financial contracts which determines the price of oil. According to data provided by the CME Group, the amount of crude oil futures contracts traded daily on its platform rose in 2022 over 2021 and is nearly double that of a decade ago. For example, Total Energies, the French Oil supermajor may trade 7 million barrels of physical oil a day, but on the same day will electronically trade the equivalent of 31 million barrels of oil futures and options on an electronic exchange.
Physical commodities trading requires matching numerous diverse producers and consumers with heterogeneous and highly idiosyncratic preferences directing resources to their highest value uses in response to price signals requiring strong relationships with market players (buyers and sellers of commodities). Physical commodities markets are mostly cyclic, have a seasonal trend and a convenience yield (the consumer wants it now and is willing to pay a higher price for it). Physical commodities traders search producer side and consumer side of the market to find sellers and buyers (bilateral “search” markets), and match them by buying from the former and selling to the latter in bilateral transactions in between adding value by transforming the commodities. Commodities producers are usually not end users and commodities need to be transported from source to destinations creating bottlenecks and an opportunity to make significant margins for traders. Physical traders can also profit through shipping, warehousing, and trade finance of the commodities. Physical commodities trading is also known as the “spot” or “cash” market.
Physical commodities trading is a human-driven business - Humans and relationships are predominant from the very beginning until the end of the trade. Humans will extract coal and assess the quality of it. Humans will test the quality of coal at loading port and discharging port. Human will negotiate premiums and discounts. Human will react against market movements and sometimes refuse to deliver or receive the commodity if prices go against market direction based on market intelligence.
Electronic Exchanges trading commodities futures are not suited to this matching process. They may be an efficient way to transact highly standardized instruments such as plain-vanilla front month contracts in large quantity, but are not well-adapted to predict the downward or upward price movement on commodities such as natural gas resulting from a pipeline explosion or the reaction of oil prices to a news events about an outbreak of war or comments from a Saudi oil minister. Little physical commodities actually change hands with futures trades, which take place on two main exchanges in the US, CME Group and the Intercontinental Exchange. In some commodities such as oil, futures trading has come to dwarf the physical trade, with as much as 13 times the physical amount of oil traded via these purely financial contracts which determines the price of oil. According to data provided by the CME Group, the amount of crude oil futures contracts traded daily on its platform rose in 2022 over 2021 and is nearly double that of a decade ago. For example, Total Energies, the French Oil supermajor may trade 7 million barrels of physical oil a day, but on the same day will electronically trade the equivalent of 31 million barrels of oil futures and options on an electronic exchange.
Labels:
Futures,
Oil,
Oil trading,
Physical commodities,
Trading
Location:
New Jersey, USA
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
